Imminent Verdict in Ripple Vs. SEC Battle: Here’s What Experts Are Saying!
![Imminent Verdict in Ripple Vs. SEC Battle: Here’s What Experts Are Saying!](https://cryptoinvestment.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/imminent-verdict-in-ripple-vs-sec-battle-heres-what-experts-are-saying.webp)
The post Imminent Verdict in Ripple Vs. SEC Battle: Here’s What Experts Are Saying! appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News
Get ready to witness a decisive chapter in the ongoing legal saga between Ripple Labs Inc. and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). According to industry veteran Marc Fagel, a former attorney and SEC’s San Francisco regional director, we could see a critical turning point in this landmark case in just a few days.
Legal Insights and Speculations
Fagel’s insights came in response to an anxious tweet from a member of the XRP community. The tweet expressed fears about the SEC possibly dropping its lawsuits before summary judgement, a move that could potentially undermine the authority of the presiding judge.
Adding fuel to the fire, the tweet also suggested that a delay in the ruling could be construed as the judge being influenced by public reactions, creating a whirlwind of confusion and speculation. Fagel, while cautious not to speculate, hinted that a ruling could be just days away. He attributed any delay in the case to its inherent complexity, rather than a sign of any hidden agenda.
Also Read – Ripple Vs SEC News : Pro-XRP lawyer says Hinman Did Not Tell the Truth
Ripple: A Unique Case for the SEC
Fagel also pointed out that Ripple, the company behind the XRP cryptocurrency, is not your typical defendant in SEC enforcement actions. He mentioned that the judge’s ruling is unlikely to touch upon the issue of secondary market trading. Furthermore, the controversial Hinman emails will likely only factor into the ruling in relation to individual defendants’ liability.
A Lawyer’s Perspective: Missteps and Confidence
John Deaton, an attorney who also serves as a legal representative for XRP holders, shared his own take on the case. Deaton contended that charging individual executives with aiding and abetting, based on a recklessness standard, was a significant misstep by the SEC. He expressed confidence that no reasonable jury would deem any executives reckless in this case.
Will this case result in new standards for the cryptocurrency industry, or will it simply be another chapter in the ongoing debate over digital assets’ legal status? The legal drama unfolds in the coming days.